翻訳と辞書 ・ Wilcze Bagno
・ Wilcze Błota
・ Wilcze Błota Kościerskie
・ Wilcze Góry
・ Wilcze Jary
・ Wilbur Wright und seine Flugmaschine (film)
・ Wilbur Wynant House
・ Wilbur Young
・ Wilbur Zelinsky
・ Wilbur, Indiana
・ Wilbur, Oregon
・ Wilbur, Trenton, New Jersey
・ Wilbur, Washington
・ Wilbur, West Virginia
・ Wilbur-by-the-Sea, Florida
・ Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther
・ Wilburgstetten
・ Wilburn
・ Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
・ Wilburn Cartwright
・ Wilburn Chandler Hamilton
・ Wilburn Hill King
・ Wilburn Hollis
・ Wilburn K. Ross
・ Wilburn Snyder
・ Wilburn Township, Ford County, Kansas
・ Wilburn, Alabama
・ Wilburn, Arkansas
・ Wilburt S. Brown
・ Wilburtha, New Jersey
|
|
| Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther
(詳細はUnited States Supreme Court decision that extended the repair-reconstruction doctrine of ''Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.''〔( 365 U.S. 336 (1961) ).〕 to enhancement of function.
== Background ==
Wilbur-Ellis Company (Wilbur-Ellis) purchased four used, patented sardine-canning machines that were badly in need of repair.〔They were "corroded, rusted, and inoperative; and all required cleaning and sandblasting to make them usable." 377 U.S. at 423.〕 Wilbur-Ellis tried to persuade Kuther, the patent owner, who had originally made and sold the machines, to refurbish them but met with no success. Wilbur-Ellis therefore hired a mechanic to repair and modify them so that they would handle different sized cans and different sized sardines.〔Wilbur-Ellis replaced six of the 35 parts with different sized components, so that the machine would pack 5-ounce cans instead of 1-pound cans. 377 U.S. at 423.〕 Kuther then sued Wilbur-Ellis for “making” the machine anew.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. Kuther」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|